Wednesday, December 25, 2024

Casiple: Political Dynasties Triumph, Not Parties

3

Casiple: Political Dynasties Triumph, Not Parties

3

How do you feel about this story?

Like
Love
Haha
Wow
Sad
Angry

Veteran Political Analyst Ramon Casiple said last Tuesday, that it’s a political dynasty instead of political parties in 2022 elections. 

Casiple was interviewed on PTV-4 and mentioned that banning families to run for any multiple elective post will take longer and lawmakers will easily terminate measures introduced in Congress. Several anti-political dynasty bills filed before Congress that remain pending at the committee level. 

He also added, political dynasty’s endorsement of a national candidate could also possibly boost the latter’s chances of winning in polls. 

“Walang lumitaw na pangalan na political party hindi kagaya nung panahon may Nacionalista Party, Liberal PartyAng tumatambad sa atin ngayon ay mga pamilya. Kaya yung tatakbo sa ganitong family suportado ng ibang family, ganyan ang naging kalakaran ng ating eleksyon ngayon. “ He said.

“Pati yung mga patakaran at programa ng sino mang nanalo, protektado ‘yan ng interes ng political families.” He added.

Two of the country’s powerful political families have teamed up for the presidential and vice-presidential elections namely Ferdinand “Bongbong” Marcos Jr. and Sara Duterte, respectively. 

Meanwhile, President Rodrigo Roa Duterte mentioned last month that political clans are holding several positions because people outcry for help and said he himself and his children had no choice but to heed the leaders’ calls for them to run for public office. 

As Sara runs for vice presidential position, Duterte’s two other children ran in the May 9 polls — Paolo as 1st District representative of Davao City, and Sebastian as mayor.

Also, Duterte said political dynasties are “not bad” and are here to stay unless the 1987 Constitution is amended, said last November 2021. As 1987 Constitution prohibits political dynasties, but Congress has not passed a law to implement Article II Section 26, which mandates “equal access to opportunities for public service.”

Photo credit: Facebook/cibac.partylist

Disclaimer: The views and opinions expressed on this website, including all written content, articles, and posts, are solely those of the individual authors, whether they are employees, contributors, or guest writers. These views and opinions do not necessarily reflect the official policy or position of the website's management, officers, partners, employees, affiliates, or any other associated entities. The content provided and the information contained therein are sourced independently by the respective writers and are not influenced, endorsed, or verified by the management or any other parties associated with the website. Readers are encouraged to conduct their own research and seek appropriate guidance before making any decisions based on the content of this site.

President In Action

Metro Manila